tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6297413898275266606.post5003672126034642113..comments2024-03-27T18:15:59.096+08:00Comments on Economics Malaysia: 4Q2012 National Accountshishamhhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06265308095732759923noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6297413898275266606.post-68584805519353307052013-02-22T12:04:16.512+08:002013-02-22T12:04:16.512+08:00Jason,
On the ppt contribution point, that depend...Jason,<br /><br />On the ppt contribution point, that depends on how you measure it. Investment change was minor if you compared it from a year earlier. If you did it y-o-y, even government expenditure change would be larger than inventory change.<br /><br />My guts do agree that >20% investment is unsustainable. Still, I really don't know enough to say much investment there are out there Hafiz Noor Shamshttp://maddruid.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6297413898275266606.post-64291049689149533692013-02-22T10:16:16.516+08:002013-02-22T10:16:16.516+08:00If you did the percentage point contribution, it&#...If you did the percentage point contribution, it's actually inventory change that contributed to growth but again it's still a statistical quirk (because it's a reduction of a negative value that sparked the growth!)<br /><br />...and probably explains the robust growth along the supply side indicators.<br /><br />...and is similar to the percentage point contribution distribution Jasonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03517459200735545587noreply@blogger.com