Friday, November 4, 2011

Weekend Reading: Dani Rodrik On The Influence Of Milton Friedman

Harvard professor, free market sceptic and mixed economy evangelist Dani Rodrik on Uncle Milt (excerpt):

Milton Friedman’s Magical Thinking
Dani Rodrik

CAMBRIDGE – Next year will mark the 100th anniversary of Milton Friedman’s birth. Friedman was one of the twentieth century’s leading economists, a Nobel Prize winner who made notable contributions to monetary policy and consumption theory. But he will be remembered primarily as the visionary who provided the intellectual firepower for free-market enthusiasts during the second half of the century, and as the Ă©minence grise behind the dramatic shift in the economic policies that took place after 1980...

...But Friedman also produced a less felicitous legacy. In his zeal to promote the power of markets, he drew too sharp a distinction between the market and the state. In effect, he presented government as the enemy of the market. He therefore blinded us to the evident reality that all successful economies are, in fact, mixed. Unfortunately, the world economy is still contending with that blindness in the aftermath of a financial crisis that resulted, in no small part, from letting financial markets run too free.

The Friedmanite perspective greatly underestimates the institutional prerequisites of markets. Let the government simply enforce property rights and contracts, and – presto! – markets can work their magic. In fact, the kind of markets that modern economies need are not self-creating, self-regulating, self-stabilizing, or self-legitimizing. Governments must invest in transport and communication networks; counteract asymmetric information, externalities, and unequal bargaining power; moderate financial panics and recessions; and respond to popular demands for safety nets and social insurance.

Markets are the essence of a market economy in the same sense that lemons are the essence of lemonade. Pure lemon juice is barely drinkable. To make good lemonade, you need to mix it with water and sugar. Of course, if you put too much water in the mix, you ruin the lemonade, just as too much government meddling can make markets dysfunctional. The trick is not to discard the water and the sugar, but to get the proportions right. Hong Kong, which Friedman held up as the exemplar of a free-market society, remains the exception to the mixed-economy rule – and even there the government has played a large role in providing land for housing...

We need to make good lemonade…hit the link above for more

2 comments:

  1. HK is NOT an exception to the mixed-economy rule. As a deeply open economy, it is just free-riding on the regulations of its suppliers and clients.

    ReplyDelete
  2. where are we on this Govt n free market equation post Pemandu?Hv we got the right lemonade recipe?

    ReplyDelete